Why the message of the GP Forward View may not be getting through

9 June 2017

By David Colin-Thomé

General practice over the last few years, despite continuing to provide over 80% of all the clinical consultations in the NHS, has seen its workload hugely increased and its actual share of NHS finances reduced. Announcing the GP Forward View in 2016, Simon Stevens, chief executive since April 2014 of NHS England, said he was “openly acknowledging” the problems and acting on them.
 
We have a GP service which optimally needs to deliver on first point of contact care, continuous person and family focused care, care for all common health needs, management of chronic disease, referral and coordination of specialist care, care of the health of the population as well as the individual (Chambers and Colin-Thomé: Doctors Managing in Primary Care – International Focus 2008).
 
General practice is commendably still the most popular and the clinical service most highly ranked by the Care Quality Commission. This is despite increasing pressure and stresses that threaten its sustainability.
 
All practices small or large, rural or urban, successful or vulnerable need to deliver on that range of services. They may deliver by working either singly or by cooperating with other practices.
 
If a multi-practice, each practice may by agreement only deliver some of these services themselves, with the proviso their patients will receive the full range facilitated or provided by the larger organisation.
 
The current programme to introduce pharmacists into general practice to help with the increasingly pressurised service, needs similarly to be cognisant of local needs and match them with pharmacists with the appropriate skill to meet those needs. It may be appropriate for the pharmacist to be employed at the larger GP organisation level and make them available for individual practices.
 
Other staff needed in general practice, such as physiotherapists, could be similarly employed. Variation in funding to and by practices will need to be decided locally. The role of the larger GP organisation has become enormously significant in the modern context.
 
General medical practice’s heritage, strength and popularity with its patients have been earned by being local to its community and offering continuity of care. These virtues must be preserved and to fulfil the potential of general practice as a local provider and as a service that can shape and transform the NHS, it must be concomitantly small and large – small as an essential element of local social capital and large to be of strategic importance. The ongoing relationship between the practice and the larger GP or broader primary care organisation is fundamental.
 
NHS England is completely committed to major support for general practice but to avoid confusion, duplication and yet enhance support, a rationalisation of various national programmes is essential.
 
Within the umbrella of the GP Forward View, there are numerous programmes, some like those for access, vulnerable practices and resilience, confusingly overlapping and others (like the clinical pharmacists programme) addressing discrete issues of workforce and organisation.
 
The aims of these programmes are all worthwhile and pulling in broadly the same direction, but the existence of multiple programmes with separate funding arrangements is likely to induce piecemeal and siloed working.
 
How do these services aimed at individual practices relate to the larger organisations to which an estimated three-quarters of English general practices belong?
 
GP federations and the primary care home sites see developing, enthusing and enhancing local general practice as an essential part of their broader provider responsibility. Could these larger organisations be the optimal focus for GP support and where all support programmes are synergised?
 
There is an apparent disconnect between the vision and operational reality of the GP Forward View, which was expressed in recent complaints by GP professional bodies that funding does not appear to be reaching the service.
 
This is a pity because the GP Forward View promotes a vision many GPs would sign up to: individual practice working as part of a larger local organisation – a partnership of two equals. Both clinically led, population responsible, patient and community focused but with differing attributes that together can greatly enhance the offer to patients, public and the NHS.
 
Professor David Colin-Thomé is chair of PCC, a former national director of primary care with the Department of Health and honorary visiting professor at Manchester Business School.

For information about PCC’s support for primary care development, contact enquiries@pcc-cic.org.uk

 
Support updates Our news

Latest News

Communities and health

20 February 2018

The role of communities in improving health is receiving increasing, and long overdue, attention in health policy and practice. Stronger recognition of the role communities can play and greater involvement are needed if there is to be a successful move to population health systems. A briefing from the King’s Fund is a starting point for those wishing to understand more.

Read More

Systems integration to boost NHS communication

20 February 2018

NHS staff will be able to communicate with each other through better integrated systems, thanks to new plans announced by NHS Digital. The plans will eventually see users being able to log into a range of applications and services, integrated with Microsoft Azure Active Directory (Azure AD), using their NHSmail credentials.

The initiative will integrate NHSmail, which uses Microsoft Exchange and Skype for Business to securely share patient information, with Office 365.

All NHS employees can use NHSmail, as can those organisations commissioned to deliver NHS services.

Read More

Next steps in updating guidance on ME and chronic fatigue syndrome

20 February 2018

A workshop last month marked the formal start of NICE’s collaborative work to update its 2010 guideline on the diagnosis and management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS).

The workshop was held so that stakeholders, including patient groups for people with ME/CFS and their carers, could help NICE identify at an early stage the issues they consider most important for the development of the new guideline.

Read More

What should the new CCIO do first?

20 February 2018

The NHS has appointed an emergency care consultant as chief clinical information officer, a nearly new post with only one previous occupant. Simon Eccles has already tweeted his top five priorities. What should he put at the top of the list? Vote on this week’s NHS Networks poll at www.networks.nhs.uk

Read More

Conflict of interest – beyond self-assessment

20 February 2018

Conflicts of interest pose a significant risk to CCGs and emerging integrated care systems (ICS), which could leave commissioners exposed to reputational damage or result in decisions being open to challenge. Managing conflicts is a discipline requiring judgement, insight and the ability to evaluate risk. Talking through scenarios with colleagues is the best way to develop these capabilities. PCC delivers local workshops where members of CCG governing bodies work together to discuss potential issues. Boards that take part are able to identify potential concerns, understand how to approach issues and increase their confidence in local governance arrangements when taking decisions. Find out more about our conflict of interest workshops, which can be delivered on your premises. To discuss your requirements with one of our advisers email enquiries@pcc-cic.org.uk.

Read More